|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 22, 2014 19:45:42 GMT
Well playing devils advocate, you could cgi out the tardis replace it with something else. do new credits &call the programme something else and dub out any mention of tardis. At £ 20 quid a pop worldwide sales would give you a more than the 0£ you would get from simply giving it back to the BBC......... Would you want it then ? Not me ! |
|
|
|
Post by malcolmostlere on Jan 22, 2014 19:47:06 GMT
Well playing devils advocate, you could cgi out the tardis replace it with something else. do new credits &call the programme something else and dub out any mention of tardis. At £ 20 quid a pop worldwide sales would give you a more than the 0£ you would get from simply giving it back to the BBC......... Sorry double post. Luckily I copyrighted the first post and I will now sue myself and make a mint .......... |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 22, 2014 19:52:43 GMT
Well playing devils advocate, you could cgi out the tardis replace it with something else. do new credits &call the programme something else and dub out any mention of tardis. At £ 20 quid a pop worldwide sales would give you a more than the 0£ you would get from simply giving it back to the BBC......... Sorry double post. Luckily I copyrighted the first post and I will now sue myself a make a mint .......... Its clear there is something going on. We have two sides on here. The yeah's and the neah's. Each must make their own mind up ! Tho i must say that when the last two came back the neah's were very QUIET LOL |
|
|
|
Post by malcolmostlere on Jan 22, 2014 19:55:48 GMT
Well playing devils advocate, you could cgi out the tardis replace it with something else. do new credits &call the programme something else and dub out any mention of tardis. At £ 20 quid a pop worldwide sales would give you a more than the 0£ you would get from simply giving it back to the BBC......... Would you want it then ? Not me ! Well Would you buy Marco Polo if the BBC were selling it sans credits and with 30 seconds of Its footage missing in total from all its episodes. if so then the only reason not to buy would be the CGI replacement of the Tardis which I belive would be hardly ever on screen during MP. |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 22, 2014 20:03:39 GMT
Would you want it then ? Not me ! Well Would you büy Marco Polo if the BBC were selling it sans credits and with 30 seconds of Its footage missing in total from all its episodes. if so then the only reason Not to büy woulf be the CGI replacement of the Tardis which I belive would be hardly ever on screen during MP. It would not happen anyway. But just say if it did. Than no ! I wont be held to ransome buy that person !!! |
|
|
|
Post by malcolmostlere on Jan 22, 2014 20:09:54 GMT
Well Would you büy Marco Polo if the BBC were selling it sans credits and with 30 seconds of Its footage missing in total from all its episodes. if so then the only reason Not to büy woulf be the CGI replacement of the Tardis which I belive would be hardly ever on screen during MP. It would not happen anyway. But just say if it did. Than no ! I wont be held to ransome buy that person !!! I agree with you and feel likewise, but rather like Kerry Packer and test cricket enough would buy to ensure a profit for those who would do something like I described. |
|
|
|
Post by simonashby on Jan 22, 2014 20:14:24 GMT
I think this CGI/Copyright/Whole thing is getting a bit fantasist now...! Sorry double post. Luckily I copyrighted the first post and I will now sue myself a make a mint .......... Its clear there is something going on. We have two sides on here. The yeah's and the neah's. Each must make their own mind up ! Tho i must say that when the last two came back the neah's were very QUIET LOL Not "yeah's and neah's". It's called being neutral. Some people can't handle that concept though. That was Ian Levine. Not the BBC.
Actually it was Blue Peter, but point taken (although they do sort of count as the BBC, don't they?)
No it was Ian Levine. Blue Peter was just a vehicle for advertising it. |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 22, 2014 20:16:06 GMT
It would not happen anyway. But just say if it did. Than no ! I wont be held to ransome buy that person !!! I agree with you and feel likewise, but rather like Kerry Packer and test cricket enough would buy to ensure a profit for those who would do something like I described. It would only make it happen more ! If this person wants to hoard then let him. Nowt we can do about it ! |
|
|
|
Post by Richard Bignell on Jan 22, 2014 20:24:57 GMT
No it was Ian Levine. Blue Peter was just a vehicle for advertising it. Not only that, but IIRC, he wasn't even going to pay for it himself. He was hoping to get some friends to fund the purchase. |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 22, 2014 21:25:22 GMT
I think this CGI/Copyright/Whole thing is getting a bit fantasist now...! Its clear there is something going on. We have two sides on here. The yeah's and the neah's. Each must make their own mind up ! Tho i must say that when the last two came back the neah's were very QUIET LOL Not "yeah's and neah's". It's called being neutral. Some people can't handle that concept though.
Actually it was Blue Peter, but point taken (although they do sort of count as the BBC, don't they?)
No it was Ian Levine. Blue Peter was just a vehicle for advertising it. Well there you go  |
|
|
|
Post by mattplace on Jan 22, 2014 23:49:55 GMT
Sorry double post. Luckily I copyrighted the first post and I will now sue myself a make a mint .......... Its clear there is something going on. We have two sides on here. The yeah's and the neah's. Each must make their own mind up ! Tho i must say that when the last two came back the neah's were very QUIET LOL I am neither a yeah.. or a neah.... i honestly would be surprised if more were returned.. but after the last 2 or so years anything is possible. However as a "neah" i get a bit drained by reading all the "yeah's" posting their beliefs as facts ..."Its clear there is something going on"... It's not clear what so ever...."clear" would mean you have some evidence but you don't.. its just guessing. As for the "neah" going quiet after the eotw/wof find ... maybe they were being drowned out by the "yeah" saying I told you so and here come the other 80 odd rediscovered episodes... |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 23, 2014 8:58:20 GMT
Trouble with sitting on the fence is you get splinters in your arse  Have to say i am of the opinion it is more likely than not. And the way the past few months have gone you would be Dumb to bet against it |
|
|
|
Post by simonashby on Jan 23, 2014 9:32:21 GMT
Trouble with sitting on the fence is you get splinters in your arse. Given this situation, explain how this is the case. I'd really like to hear. |
|
|
|
Post by shellyharman67 on Jan 23, 2014 11:57:38 GMT
Trouble with sitting on the fence is you get splinters in your arse. Given this situation, explain how this is the case. I'd really like to hear. Seeing as this person is playing god it would seem. I will answer when they cough up ! |
|
|
|
Post by simonashby on Jan 23, 2014 18:22:35 GMT
Given this situation, explain how this is the case. I'd really like to hear. Seeing as this person is playing god it would seem. I will answer when they cough up ! The real answer is that sitting on the fence means being pleasantly surprised if something turns up, and not being disappointed if something doesn't. Simples! |
|
Have to say i am of the opinion it is more likely than not. And the way the past few months have gone you would be Dumb to bet against it