|
|
Post by Michael on Jun 30, 2005 19:33:00 GMT
Re the mystery of how the 2003 thread appeared-thank you to Steven S for explaining it fully and how it got where it was.
I think that we have all learned something from this escapade-not just to check the small print first.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Roberts on Jul 1, 2005 10:00:07 GMT
It just goes to show how quixkly people can jump onto something, and belive soemthing, without checking the (very plain to see) facts first. How do you think certain politicians got to where they are?
On a semi-related note does anyone know what may be on the line-dup at THIS YEAR's event?
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve Mckenzie on Jul 1, 2005 12:34:46 GMT
So are they showing the lost D for Destruction or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by robby on Jul 1, 2005 14:25:32 GMT
according to Steven apprantly not,this was shown in 2003 .
but i think we will have to wate for Dick fiddy to get back from his holiday to find out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Douglas on Jul 1, 2005 17:38:47 GMT
according to Steven apprantly not,this was shown in 2003 . but i think we will have to wate for Dick fiddy to get back from his holiday to find out. No - they're not. It's not terribly complicated - it's an old thread regarding the 2003 event - it has nothing to do with this year's MBW! Stuart |
|
|
|
Post by ethantyler on Jul 1, 2005 18:16:59 GMT
I think this has become a deliberate wind-up now, either that or it's the strangest thread ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 1, 2005 20:31:16 GMT
All i know is that they are going to show the "lost" LWT Potter play Shaggy Dog and a Gerry Anderson commercial.
The rest of the shedule has'nt been finalised yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Freddy Thomson on Jul 5, 2005 6:39:50 GMT
What I understand is that this post was originally made by Dick Fiddy in 2003, referring to the 2003 MBW.
Then last month somebody brought it back from the old archives of this site, which brought it back to the first page.
Somebody then thought that this meant that the 2005 MBW event would merely be a repeat of the 2003 MBW event.
But it's not. This year's MBW line-up remains uncertain as of right now.
D for Destruction et al will not be rebroadcast at this year's MBW event.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Jones on Jul 5, 2005 8:07:21 GMT
One rather depressing thing about this post has been to view the now/then perspective.
How many things are excitedly found and broadcast at MBW, only to be subsequently filed away in some dusty room and never seen or mentioned again?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan on Jul 5, 2005 8:57:10 GMT
Hang on, so then they aren't going to show "D For Destruction" at THIS year's event?
Could somebody please explain what is going on here?
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Roberts on Jul 5, 2005 10:40:23 GMT
1)In 2003 Dick Fiddy posted a message on this board giving details of the 2003 MBW event.
2)In 2005 someone reawakened this post.
3)Many people put 2 and 2 together, and thought that the 2005 MBW event will be a repeat of the 2003 event.
4)The MBW event will not be a repeat of the 2003 MBW event. This includes D for Destruction.
5)Got it?
|
|
|
|
Post by robby on Jul 5, 2005 10:48:28 GMT
Dus any 1 know when Dick Fiddy gets back from his holiday as he might be able to halp
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan on Jul 5, 2005 10:54:22 GMT
What I don't get is why Dick Fiddy would have posted this message right now if it didn't have any significance to this eyar's MBW?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark Brown on Jul 5, 2005 13:25:09 GMT
What I don't get is why Dick Fiddy would have posted this message right now if it didn't have any significance to this eyar's MBW? he didn't look at the date on your post now look at his. |
|
|
|
Post by Stuart Douglas on Jul 5, 2005 14:00:42 GMT
What I don't get is why Dick Fiddy would have posted this message right now if it didn't have any significance to this eyar's MBW? he didn't look at the date on your post now look at his. Please Mark - for the love of God lock this thread (then take it outside, shoot it and bury it in a lead-lined box, otherwise someone will surely resurrect it just long enough to ask 'So, are they showing D for Destruction then?') Stuart |
|
