|
Post by Richard Bignell on Sept 25, 2006 15:06:02 GMT
I'm sorry? What recent discovery of a lost ABC vault? Is this for real? You should be able to work out from the first sentence of Martin's post, that he isn't being entirely serious! Richard
|
|
|
Post by William Martin on Sept 26, 2006 16:41:23 GMT
It was misfiled in a z cars film can
|
|
|
Post by Martin Dunne on Sept 27, 2006 7:35:03 GMT
I'm sorry? What recent discovery of a lost ABC vault? Is this for real? No!
|
|
|
Post by B Thomas on Sept 27, 2006 11:29:49 GMT
But you can expect the suggestion to keep re-surfacing as rumour at least once a year for the next few decades...
|
|
|
Post by Martin Dunne on Sept 29, 2006 4:15:54 GMT
Sigh. Yes. Well let's start some more... Verity Lambert Took Work Home With Her, Including Marco Polo part 8... Mission the the Unknown Was Used In The BBC Director's Course To Demonstrate How Dispensible The Regular Cast Could Be... and William Hartnel Was Given part 4 Of Planet of the Giants Becuase It Was A Bit Crap.
|
|
|
Post by Nicholas Fitzpatrick on Sept 29, 2006 23:12:27 GMT
... and William Hartnel Was Given part 4 Of Planet of the Giants because It Was A Bit Crap. I'd heard that he got the the bits they cut out of 3 and 4, and used to use it to floss his teeth
|
|
|
Post by B Thomas on Sept 29, 2006 23:30:40 GMT
Along with the work print for 'The Tenth Planet' Part 5...
|
|
|
Post by Charles Roberts on Oct 5, 2006 7:46:24 GMT
By Marco Polo episode 8, do you mean the fact that it was originally shot as an eight-part story, but then episodes 7 and 8 were edited together to make a more dramatic final episode? If so, then we'd still be missing the original episode 7....
|
|
|
Post by B Thomas on Oct 5, 2006 11:38:23 GMT
I thought he meant the original 42-episode version of Marco Polo as originally shot on colour 70mm film?
|
|
|
Post by mikej on Oct 5, 2006 19:36:46 GMT
As is clear from the other recent posting, this wasn't quite as obvious as people like Richard Bignell thought it was.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Roberts on Oct 6, 2006 9:34:23 GMT
What wasn't quite as obvious?
|
|