|
Post by jellyhedge on Feb 22, 2004 9:02:24 GMT
Are any of "That was the week that was",missing or wiped out from the bbc archives?
|
|
|
Post by phantom emailer on Feb 22, 2004 19:36:30 GMT
yes and yes to both.
|
|
|
Post by John Sewell on Feb 22, 2004 23:15:29 GMT
Roger Wilmut's From Fringe To Flying Circus has a brief note at the back which says that "most" of them exist on 16mm. One which he identifies as being missing is the edition from 8/12/62, which caused a fuss by re-editing film of a Harold MacMillan speech to make it look like he was talking nonsense.
ISTR also reading somewhere that the shows were recorded so that BBC bosses had something to refer to if there were any complaints, and a lot of the surviving telerecordings are quite poor in quality, as they weren't meant for repeating, so less care was taken with the process. Sorry not to be of more help. Anyone else got any specific dates for missing editions, or other info?
|
|
|
Post by andrew martin on Feb 23, 2004 19:48:15 GMT
The edition from 8/12/62 does still exist in fact - the very first edition tx'd 24/11/62 is missing its first reel, and there is one other edition where the recording started late so it is incomplete, but apart from that the only completely missing episode is the first, untx'd pilot.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Hayes on Feb 27, 2004 17:49:20 GMT
I can personally vouch for the 8/12/62 edition existing, as I saw a screening of a BFI print of it here at the University of East Anglia back in December, back-to-back with the Kennedy edition from 23/11/63.
|
|
|
Post by John Sewell on Feb 27, 2004 19:50:45 GMT
Seems I'm (thankfully) wrong then! In mitigation, the book dates from 1980, so maybe there were still some mislaid editions then, which might have turned up since? Fascinating that TW3's archive status is more or less complete, seeing as it was a topical, live show with no overseas sales potential, I would imagine. A good deal of shows from the same time have been decimated!
|
|
|
Post by dubs on Feb 28, 2004 13:00:18 GMT
Would it not have retained for legal reasons?
Or is this a recent development?
Certainly I think news programmes have to be retained for a certain length of time nowadays in case of BCC queries or legal actions.
|
|
|
Post by Steve Burstein on Aug 4, 2005 22:09:46 GMT
Back in the '70s in America, somebody insisted to me that he had seen the British TW3 and that it was "Exactly like Monty Python". But what do you expect. Americans thought BENNY HILL was like Monty Python!
|
|
|
Post by lfbarfe on Aug 18, 2005 23:41:11 GMT
ISTR also reading somewhere that the shows were recorded so that BBC bosses had something to refer to if there were any complaints, and a lot of the surviving telerecordings are quite poor in quality, as they weren't meant for repeating, so less care was taken with the process. I believe that the system used for making one-off reference recordings was called direct positive telerecording. The monitor would put out a negative image, which would be recorded on negative film stock, resulting in a single, positive copy.
|
|
|
Post by J Richards on Aug 19, 2005 2:39:48 GMT
I can't believe that virtually all of this survives yet hardly anything of Not Only But Also. Bet that got up Peter Cook's nose considering how much he disliked David Frost.
|
|
|
Post by Laurence Piper on Aug 19, 2005 8:06:48 GMT
The edition from 8/12/62 does still exist in fact - the very first edition tx'd 24/11/62 is missing its first reel, and there is one other edition where the recording started late so it is incomplete, but apart from that the only completely missing episode is the first, untx'd pilot. Just to clarify, Andrew. Are you referring to just the first series of TW3 as existing almost complete or to the whole run? My Kal guide from the mid '90s lists series 2 as missing a lot of episodes. Good news if untrue.
|
|
|
Post by andrew martin on Aug 19, 2005 13:25:33 GMT
No, I was referring to the whole run. The next edition of the Kaleidscope guide will be corrected!
Regarding the existence of this series compared to NOBA - TW3 was made by the current affairs department, which has always tended to keep much more of its material.
|
|
|
Post by Laurence Piper on Aug 19, 2005 19:30:34 GMT
Ah, that's good news Andrew.
|
|