|
Argh!
Apr 27, 2005 9:01:12 GMT
Post by Guest on Apr 27, 2005 9:01:12 GMT
Please can we have some sanity in this forum again? None of the active threads are about missing TOTP footage and the active threads are getting petty.
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 27, 2005 14:38:12 GMT
Post by William Martin on Apr 27, 2005 14:38:12 GMT
hello Mr Guest, we seem to have run out of ideas at the moment so perhaps you could start a new thread for us, the only thing I can think about at the moment is that back projection stuff from 1968 but have heard no more about it yet.
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 27, 2005 16:32:08 GMT
Post by Gary on Apr 27, 2005 16:32:08 GMT
I'd give up on Mr Guest as he cant even remember his own name.
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 28, 2005 14:25:18 GMT
Post by Guest on Apr 28, 2005 14:25:18 GMT
hello Mr Guest, we seem to have run out of ideas at the moment so perhaps you could start a new thread for us, the only thing I can think about at the moment is that back projection stuff from 1968 but have heard no more about it yet. i'm not saying we need loads of new threads just that its getting very childish in here in regards to some of the lineup threads. wouldn't it be better if the lineup requests were kept to a single thread so that the ontopic posts aren't pushed off the page?
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 28, 2005 18:19:41 GMT
Post by Roger Dagoat on Apr 28, 2005 18:19:41 GMT
Up until this year this forum was quite informative, but ideas seem to have run out allowing pointless threads to flourish. I realise there is only so much you can ask about missing performances of TOTP and the like and most have already been answered. I just think that if you haven`t anything worthwhile to post, don`t bother at all.
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 29, 2005 8:24:25 GMT
Post by CliveUK on Apr 29, 2005 8:24:25 GMT
....and a big 'Hello' there to TV Creamguide
your tentacles really do get everywhere.....
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 29, 2005 16:07:59 GMT
Post by William on Apr 29, 2005 16:07:59 GMT
i'm not saying we need loads of new threads just that its getting very childish in here in regards to some of the lineup threads. wouldn't it be better if the lineup requests were kept to a single thread so that the ontopic posts aren't pushed off the page? rather like a gas, the silly threads will expand to fill the available space but I'm sure they won't exclude the good topics as they come. ok what about this Peter Sellers appeared on the 30/12/67 totp , is there anyway of finding out about whether this survived the PS burning sprees and still exists, rather than going to the Lyn Frederic estate.
|
|
|
Argh!
Apr 29, 2005 16:15:20 GMT
Post by Roger Dagoat on Apr 29, 2005 16:15:20 GMT
As far as i know, only the 26-12-67 edition exists out of that whole year, so the chances of anything from the 30-12-67 turning up are very slim.
|
|
|
Argh!
May 5, 2005 14:21:12 GMT
Post by William Martin on May 5, 2005 14:21:12 GMT
yes it's almost certianly gone but as you say, it does have a slim chance.
|
|
|
Argh!
May 5, 2005 15:06:41 GMT
Post by John G on May 5, 2005 15:06:41 GMT
Slim Chance was big in Nashville William, but dont think he made it to TOTPs
|
|
|
Argh!
May 5, 2005 15:22:52 GMT
Post by William Martin on May 5, 2005 15:22:52 GMT
But Ronnie Lane did
|
|
|
Argh!
May 5, 2005 16:53:50 GMT
Post by Laurence Piper on May 5, 2005 16:53:50 GMT
[quote author=Guest-William what about this Peter Sellers appeared on the 30/12/67 totp , is there anyway of finding out about whether this survived the PS burning sprees and still exists[/quote]
I have the details here and there wasn't a TOTP on 30/12/67 (a Saturday). The nearest edition to that date was Thursday 28/12/67, which didn't contain any appearance by Peter Sellers. It doesn't exist either (officially anyway).
|
|
|
Argh!
May 14, 2005 14:31:01 GMT
Post by William Martin on May 14, 2005 14:31:01 GMT
odd?
anyway What I said was you're right I missread the database, it's 30/12/65, his one and only totp performance.
|
|