Caroline and Pete should be ashamed of themselves.

[Nick]

Using a thread with John Peel's name to continue some vendetta that I don't even want to start to understand.

Caroline (or whatever) if you don't like Pete then fine but do we all have to suffer your mindless, mis-spelt crude ramblings. And Pete ignore her (at least on this board) and if it's harrassment then collect your evidence and go to the police.

If either of you find this funny then you seriously need your head's examining. My 6 year old has more sense and eloquence than you are showing at the moment.

[Sybil Fawlty]

I'm very sorry.

I will go, not to return.

But suspect you will have more of a serious problem with cr.

Seriously, I'm very sorry.

[Sybil Fawlty]

..should add, i'm not Pete.

[pete]

and i should add it wasn't me

i simply started a thread (if you cared to read it)

that the BBC Radio Sessions should have its own database (Maida Vale et all)

[pete]

keep me out of it. it wasn't me ive been offline, ignoring the nasty so and so

[pete]

if you'd been bothered to read my contribution to this site over the last few years, im taking all of this very seriously. and i DON'T find it funny at all, there are a lot of people here ho take a high regard to my hard work to finding lost material

i am not a game player. caroline does nothing more than hassle and harrass people and i did inform you all of her.

im telling you again, she will return time and time again, so be prepared chaps

i am a serious music archivist with deep roots, and you know that

[embarrassed]

I was stating Sybil Fawlty/Bubbles isn't Pete in disguise.

Please understand posters this woman caroline rose has been posting the most vile and unbelievable things at the BBC boards, for some months, daily drip feeding mainly Pete myself and several others.

She has since been banned from there, and is having criminal proceedings against her.

I have 'saved' the postings she sent to me threatening to come to my home etc.
Should they be needed as evidence.

I

[Shaun]

>She has since been banned from there, and is having >criminal proceedings against her.

For posting abusive messages online? What, exactly, would she be charged with?

[Stuart]

Guest-Shaun said:

>She has since been banned from there, and is having >criminal proceedings against her.

For posting abusive messages online? What, exactly, would she be charged with?

Possibly the Protection from Harassment Act or the Malicious Communications Act, both of which have been mooted as of potential use in prosecuting 'cyberstalkers'?

For other countries, try here for a list of anti-cyberstalker laws :

www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/index.shtml

Stuart