|
|
Post by mattbarker on Jan 17, 2024 14:26:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by davetudor on Jan 17, 2024 15:21:12 GMT
Brilliant, thanks for sharing. Oh, to have seen those costumes up-close like that - and to even tug on the Yeti fur, like one young rascal does!  |
|
|
|
Post by Leighton Haberfield on Jan 20, 2024 13:30:32 GMT
what a lovely extra that would have made on the Abominable snowmen release
I wonder why it wasnt included
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard Bignell on Jan 20, 2024 17:05:12 GMT
what a lovely extra that would have made on the Abominable snowmen release I wonder why it wasnt included Because British Pathe stuff costs a bomb to licence. |
|
|
|
Post by Richard Bignell on Jan 20, 2024 17:07:37 GMT
Isn't it nice! Yes, the British Pathe stuff has been available for viewing online for a good couple of decades, although obviously many years ago, the versions were rather smaller and less defined due to everyone being on dial-up internet.  |
|
|
|
Post by jcoleman on Jan 20, 2024 18:04:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by George D on Jan 23, 2024 16:30:55 GMT
what a lovely extra that would have made on the Abominable snowmen release I wonder why it wasnt included Because British Pathe stuff costs a bomb to licence. It would be nice if a special deal could be negotiated as a special service and that the characters in the clips have BBC trademarks which I'm unsure have been licensed for them to market |
|
|
|
Post by Richard Bignell on Jan 23, 2024 16:47:52 GMT
Because British Pathe stuff costs a bomb to licence. It would be nice if a special deal could be negotiated as a special service and that the characters in the clips have BBC trademarks which I'm unsure have been licensed for them to market It was a public event in 1967. A film shot at the event that happens to show Doctor Who costumes doesn't need to be licenced. |
|
