|
Post by Robin Stephenson on Aug 27, 2021 9:54:12 GMT
I have pmed him with TPTV info. If it is all a hoax to get one geek in myself to register with a forum over a tv show I had never heard of, well I can live with that. Took me 2 minutes if that.
|
|
|
Post by richardwoods on Aug 27, 2021 10:54:03 GMT
I have pmed him with TPTV info. If it is all a hoax to get one geek in myself to register with a forum over a tv show I had never heard of, well I can live with that. Took me 2 minutes if that. Love it!!
|
|
|
Post by Kelvin Walker on Aug 27, 2021 17:41:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Aug 27, 2021 19:22:39 GMT
Drat. Can't see the page. IMDB has it as four series of Our Man at St.Marks, with a little note that it was "also known as Our Man From St.Marks", though I think that was the official title of series four, when he'd (?) left St.Marks?
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 1, 2021 16:05:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by richardmarson on Sept 2, 2021 10:55:31 GMT
Yeah, those responses just scream time waster. "My dad won't let me take a photo of them and I'm only using pigeon post at the moment and I'm off to uni to study radio valves."
Painfully inept.
|
|
RWels
Member
Posts: 2,910
|
Post by RWels on Sept 2, 2021 15:51:20 GMT
Still can't read that ever since that nice dr. Steve Arnold banned me ( and hacked into my account to read my private messages).
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 2, 2021 16:48:41 GMT
I'm not sure of the etiquette on quoting, but after a few posts suggesting pretty strongly that it's a hoax, it's turned a bit conciliatory. I'm still fairly hopeful, but who knows?
|
|
|
Post by George D on Sept 2, 2021 17:36:05 GMT
No one has clarified who didn't show up four times. Id be disappointed to hear if that was true about someone from a preservation society and we should know who this was so we can be cautious in the future.
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 2, 2021 17:49:51 GMT
No one has clarified who didn't show up four times. Id be disappointed to hear if that was true about someone from a preservation society and we should know who this was so we can be cautious in the future. 'Spectrum', apparently.
|
|
|
Post by George D on Sept 2, 2021 17:56:48 GMT
I'm not familiar with spectrum. Are they a new archive?
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 2, 2021 19:04:09 GMT
I know them from Captain Scarlet, but figured it's a niche TV company.
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 2, 2021 19:07:07 GMT
Photos posted now. stearn notes "One is called Pay Now Live Later, the next is Objection Sustained and the 3rd is missing the credits but I think it is Eddies Acre.... but I will leave Jon to add anything else as I certainly don't wish to steal his thunder. This looks to be a very nice and interesting find."
Pay now: 21/06/1965. Ninety-Nine and Objection Sustained: 28.06/1965. Edie's Acre: 05/07/1965.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Wegg on Sept 2, 2021 19:34:00 GMT
"Spectrum" was the poster's misremembered name of the organisation that had contacted them. The early reply in that thread about being let down by broken promises four times is what convinced me their story was genuine. Work it out for yourselves.
|
|
|
Post by Joe Haynes on Sept 2, 2021 20:11:36 GMT
So we can make the assumption that spectrum is most likely Kaleidoscope as its easy to see how they could be confused. Im surprised nobody has picked these film prints up yet.
|
|