|
Post by Al Hine on Aug 31, 2020 10:26:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ronnie McDevitt on Aug 31, 2020 11:12:45 GMT
`Looks like clips from final episode of the daleks I think episode 7.’
Call me a cynic but I think the seller knows a bit more about Dr Who than he suggests.
|
|
|
Post by Alan Hayes on Aug 31, 2020 11:23:38 GMT
` Looks like clips from final episode of the daleks I think episode 7.’
Call me a cynic but I think the seller knows a bit more about Dr Who than he suggests. Quite.
|
|
|
Post by Mark Vanderlinde-Abernathy on Aug 31, 2020 11:58:37 GMT
Eh. I figured by now he’d have someone helping him identify.
|
|
|
Post by stevegerald on Sept 1, 2020 4:13:38 GMT
What's even stranger is that these two pictures are production stills:
|
|
RWels
Member
Posts: 2,863
|
Post by RWels on Sept 1, 2020 13:59:24 GMT
What's even stranger is that these two pictures are production stills: If the pictures in the add show something that isn't included, because production stills couldn't move, wouldn't that mean breaking the rules? It's all very well to sell 16mm film to hopefulls, without making definite promises; but it's another thing to falsify the item's photos. One is not against the rules, the other is.
|
|
|
Post by andyeves on Sept 4, 2020 20:12:14 GMT
TP2 has sold for £62. No further clips listed as yet although the seller did confirm that Planet Of The Giants is part of their collection, so maybe that will be next.
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 4, 2020 21:10:06 GMT
TP2 has sold for £62. No further clips listed as yet although the seller did confirm that Planet Of The Giants is part of their collection, so maybe that will be next. Hopefully from part 4.
|
|
|
Post by stevegerald on Sept 5, 2020 1:50:43 GMT
TP2 has sold for £62. No further clips listed as yet although the seller did confirm that Planet Of The Giants is part of their collection, so maybe that will be next. Hopefully from part 4. That'd be impossible even if these were made back in the '60s.
|
|
|
Post by stevegerald on Sept 5, 2020 2:06:38 GMT
What's even stranger is that these two pictures are production stills: If the pictures in the add show something that isn't included, because production stills couldn't move, wouldn't that mean breaking the rules? It's all very well to sell 16mm film to hopefulls, without making definite promises; but it's another thing to falsify the item's photos. One is not against the rules, the other is. Why would the seller do that? The rest of them are from actual clips from the episode, why would he do more work to edit stills into the film? What would he gain from doing that? I don't think the seller falsified anything, I think that these films for some reason just happen to have random stills in them, maybe whoever made these films was testing feeding stuff to his old TV or something.
|
|
|
Post by John Green on Sept 5, 2020 7:59:19 GMT
That'd be impossible even if these were made back in the '60s. Impossible back in the 60s, certainly, but didn't the DVD have a reconstituted Part 4?
|
|
|
Post by PAUL COTTON on Sept 5, 2020 8:02:26 GMT
The photograph of the Cybermen in the blizzard(from the film offer) is different from the famous publicity still to its right. The major difference is a Ealing crew member on the side of the photo apparently sat in a Camera Cart. You can also see scenery of a Castle type wall behind the Cybermen which is much less clear in the released photo due to the snow effects
|
|
|
Post by stevegerald on Sept 5, 2020 8:14:24 GMT
That'd be impossible even if these were made back in the '60s. Impossible back in the 60s, certainly, but didn't the DVD have a reconstituted Part 4? Oh, I thought you meant the actual episode 4.
|
|
|
Post by Richard Bignell on Sept 5, 2020 10:43:47 GMT
The photograph of the Cybermen in the blizzard(from the film offer) is different from the famous publicity still to its right. The major difference is a Ealing crew member on the side of the photo apparently sat in a Camera Cart. You can also see scenery of a Castle type wall behind the Cybermen which is much less clear in the released photo due to the snow effects I can't see any crewmember or castle wall in the image. Just a duplicate of the studio photograph.
|
|
|
Post by PAUL COTTON on Sept 5, 2020 12:17:59 GMT
I'm pretty sure I am right Richard. You have to click on the photograph from the film a couple of times, which takes you to the Twitter page that is shown. It makes the image clearer
|
|