Post by Paul McDermott on Sept 22, 2018 3:20:46 GMT
Ice Warriors or no, very soon we get to see Doctor Who back on the box. Or phone, or tablet, or console, or however people tune in these days.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm2PXshWC_0
New Doctor, new supporting cast, new show runner, new writers, new composer, new directors, new cameras, new lenses, pretty much new everything. Even a new time slot!
It's hopefully also going to coincide with new viewers, who stick around to gain from the wealth of enjoyment the entirety of the canon offers, and even from us still mostly sprightly fans who've seen ranks grow over the years since RTD did what seemed both obvious and inevitable but at the same time, somewhere between unlikely and impossible. I'd guess most of us have some stuff in the 55 year run that we prefer over others, and that range and diversity (some call it unevenness) keeps it able to grow and adapt. To the extent that new viewers see the series with fresh eyes for the first time, regardless of age, and go "Aha, that's why you like it - now show me more!", I think this is natural and familiar, and all to the good. And a darn sight easier nowadays to make that happen - we needn't rely on Target books to substitute for the non-missing but infrequently repeated episodes. If you told kids today that Making Of Doctor Who was as good as it got for yonks, they'd be dumbfounded!
I can't recall a show runner that held DW was easy to write for. It has specific challenges and interests, and particular constraints and balances. So a whole bunch of new writers is an interesting decision, clearly Chibnall is very confident that (a) they are very solid performers, and (b) they will give a suitably fresh tone and feel to the new era that begins with Jodie.
www.radiotimes.com/news/2018-07-22/doctor-who-to-feature-its-first-ever-writers-of-colour/
Jobbing actors see DW as a show they want in on, and that's just as true for writers. (Whatever happened to Andrew Smith? Mark Gatiss? RTD? Steven Moffat? Chris Chibnall?!) If they're a good fit, welcome aboard! Creatively, I think it makes perfect sense and it's another aspect of the realities of TV production we see over the decades of DW... Even the most familiar old hands don't always satisfy me, and my guess is that there'll be a similar range of personal taste matching ahead with Series 11. It's worked up until now, so whether that ratio is at the upper or lower bound of delightful surprise, I'm happy 2018 has new episodes to watch.
Speaking of Series 11, here's another look at it:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCt6f1Ttmy4
A few more thoughts strike me. True enough, we've been told there's a focus on new monsters, and that's fine with me. Hartnell's Doctor was the only one who started off completely fresh, and if that's really what we get, there's no reason it can't work perfectly well. (Pertwee had UNIT from the previous years back to reassure fans - but maybe Jodie won't even have them. If they do return, let's mix things up and have a more fractious dynamic. Kate can be reassigned, or MIA, or something.)
And like Hartnell, Whittaker's Doctor has a tripartite team. I'm disappointed they're all present day humans from the UK, but on reflection I think I can now see a way things might work that don't overlap. Consider a tabletop RPG, wherein there are player character classes diversified into wizard, fighter, rogue, healer. Although the Doctor is easily a multi-class, if we nominally assigned her a wizard class that'd leave the other three to sort out. I'd make Yasmin a fighter, with perhaps Graham for the rogue and Ryan for the healer? Additional to that, the brief authorised hint of the first two episodes here:
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/4e15fdc7-f279-4954-99a6-2a4fcf8b4003
suggest the Doctor is temporarily unsure of her identity. Maybe these three humans get a different sliver of her mind, which opens up a variety of Rashomon-like diversity of ways they engage with and view her, not unlike the audience? I seem to recall during Series 2, there was an indication that the TARDIS was meant to have several pilots. Perhaps when they reunite with it, it will. That would be a change from old one-switch Capaldi! The continuing absence of the TARDIS in both trailers now is surely significant. I wonder if it'll be a hybrid spin on Season 7 and 16 this year, where the Doctor and chums have to take to tracking it down, through time and space, before it gets into the wrong hands or it causes problems?
On the matter of titles, this is interesting news:
www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2018-09-20/the-new-doctor-who-title-theme-wont-appear-in-jodie-whittakers-first-episode/
Even with an extended run time for the opener, the decision was taken to focus on story, cast, mood. Clearly, the intent is to shake up expectations and to capture hearts, minds and imaginations.
It can't get titles like a generic space show with a quirky vehicle. It should be mysterious, even a little unsettling and ethereal. The weird watery movement and choral tones below give me some hope but fingers crossed all the same.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMGiqAYL1Mw
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm2PXshWC_0
New Doctor, new supporting cast, new show runner, new writers, new composer, new directors, new cameras, new lenses, pretty much new everything. Even a new time slot!
It's hopefully also going to coincide with new viewers, who stick around to gain from the wealth of enjoyment the entirety of the canon offers, and even from us still mostly sprightly fans who've seen ranks grow over the years since RTD did what seemed both obvious and inevitable but at the same time, somewhere between unlikely and impossible. I'd guess most of us have some stuff in the 55 year run that we prefer over others, and that range and diversity (some call it unevenness) keeps it able to grow and adapt. To the extent that new viewers see the series with fresh eyes for the first time, regardless of age, and go "Aha, that's why you like it - now show me more!", I think this is natural and familiar, and all to the good. And a darn sight easier nowadays to make that happen - we needn't rely on Target books to substitute for the non-missing but infrequently repeated episodes. If you told kids today that Making Of Doctor Who was as good as it got for yonks, they'd be dumbfounded!
I can't recall a show runner that held DW was easy to write for. It has specific challenges and interests, and particular constraints and balances. So a whole bunch of new writers is an interesting decision, clearly Chibnall is very confident that (a) they are very solid performers, and (b) they will give a suitably fresh tone and feel to the new era that begins with Jodie.
www.radiotimes.com/news/2018-07-22/doctor-who-to-feature-its-first-ever-writers-of-colour/
Jobbing actors see DW as a show they want in on, and that's just as true for writers. (Whatever happened to Andrew Smith? Mark Gatiss? RTD? Steven Moffat? Chris Chibnall?!) If they're a good fit, welcome aboard! Creatively, I think it makes perfect sense and it's another aspect of the realities of TV production we see over the decades of DW... Even the most familiar old hands don't always satisfy me, and my guess is that there'll be a similar range of personal taste matching ahead with Series 11. It's worked up until now, so whether that ratio is at the upper or lower bound of delightful surprise, I'm happy 2018 has new episodes to watch.
Speaking of Series 11, here's another look at it:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCt6f1Ttmy4
A few more thoughts strike me. True enough, we've been told there's a focus on new monsters, and that's fine with me. Hartnell's Doctor was the only one who started off completely fresh, and if that's really what we get, there's no reason it can't work perfectly well. (Pertwee had UNIT from the previous years back to reassure fans - but maybe Jodie won't even have them. If they do return, let's mix things up and have a more fractious dynamic. Kate can be reassigned, or MIA, or something.)
And like Hartnell, Whittaker's Doctor has a tripartite team. I'm disappointed they're all present day humans from the UK, but on reflection I think I can now see a way things might work that don't overlap. Consider a tabletop RPG, wherein there are player character classes diversified into wizard, fighter, rogue, healer. Although the Doctor is easily a multi-class, if we nominally assigned her a wizard class that'd leave the other three to sort out. I'd make Yasmin a fighter, with perhaps Graham for the rogue and Ryan for the healer? Additional to that, the brief authorised hint of the first two episodes here:
www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/4e15fdc7-f279-4954-99a6-2a4fcf8b4003
suggest the Doctor is temporarily unsure of her identity. Maybe these three humans get a different sliver of her mind, which opens up a variety of Rashomon-like diversity of ways they engage with and view her, not unlike the audience? I seem to recall during Series 2, there was an indication that the TARDIS was meant to have several pilots. Perhaps when they reunite with it, it will. That would be a change from old one-switch Capaldi! The continuing absence of the TARDIS in both trailers now is surely significant. I wonder if it'll be a hybrid spin on Season 7 and 16 this year, where the Doctor and chums have to take to tracking it down, through time and space, before it gets into the wrong hands or it causes problems?
On the matter of titles, this is interesting news:
www.radiotimes.com/news/tv/2018-09-20/the-new-doctor-who-title-theme-wont-appear-in-jodie-whittakers-first-episode/
Even with an extended run time for the opener, the decision was taken to focus on story, cast, mood. Clearly, the intent is to shake up expectations and to capture hearts, minds and imaginations.
It can't get titles like a generic space show with a quirky vehicle. It should be mysterious, even a little unsettling and ethereal. The weird watery movement and choral tones below give me some hope but fingers crossed all the same.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMGiqAYL1Mw